⚡ Workflows
Technical Arbiter (2 agents propose, 1 decides)
Make robust technical decisions by comparing two independent proposals.
Bundle files
📄ORCHESTRATION.md— Orchestration
1# ORCHESTRATION.md
2
3## Diagram
4
5 ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
6 │ Agent A │ │ Agent B │
7 │Proposal 1│ │Proposal 2│
8 └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘
9 │ │
10 └────────────┬────────────┘
11 ▼
12 ┌─────────────┐
13 │ Arbiter │
14 │ (rubric) │
15 └──────┬──────┘
16 │
17 ▼
18 ┌─────────────┐
19 │ Decision │
20 │+ justificat.│
21 └─────────────┘
22
23
24## Workflow
25Technical Arbiter (2 agents propose, 1 decides)
26
27## Objective
28Make robust technical decisions by comparing two independent proposals.
29
30## Roles
31- **Agent A:** proposal 1
32- **Agent B:** proposal 2
33- **Arbiter:** evaluates and decides
34
35## Protocol
361. A and B work independently, without influencing each other.
372. They deliver a standard format:
38 - approach
39 - pros/cons
40 - risk
41 - cost/time
423. Arbiter scores using a rubric.
434. Final selection + written justification.
44
45## Suggested Rubric (0-5)
46- Technical correctness
47- Simplicity
48- Maintainability
49- Operational risk
50- Delivery time
51
52## Closure
53- Final decision
54- Reasons for discarding
55- Conditions for reevaluation
56
Lines: 56 | Words: 146
Install
Copy bundle to your OpenClaw workspace.
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cerealskill/openclaw-agents/main/install.sh | bash -s workflow technical-arbiter ENRate this agent
Loading...
Sign in to rate this agent
Includes
- ✓ ORCHESTRATION.md
Info
- Slug
- technical-arbiter
- Lines
- 56
- Words
- 146